CKS Prime Investments LLC is a financial services company that has been involved in numerous court cases in recent months. In this article, we will take a look at recent court cases involving CKS Prime Investments and the judgments that were ruled on these cases.
In favor of CKS Prime Investments LLC, a judgment of $1,455.85 less credits of $207.50 was ruled in a case in Golden Valley, Minnesota. Court costs were set at $95.00. In a case in Wall, New Jersey, CKS Prime Investments LLC v. Jeff Lewis, 604 Leesburg Ave., Washington C.H., OH, claims amount $2,291.64 was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments.
In a case in Chicago, Illinois, CKS Prime Investments LLC v. Wanda L. Rains, Humansville; suit on account; default judgment against Rains for $2,079 was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments. In another case, CKS Prime Investments v. Baljinder Singh, Jefferson Capital Systems v. Margrett Pruitt, and Discover Bank v. Erin Lowe, DNF Associated v. Brandon L. Lintner, $16,213.58; CKS Prime Investments LLC v. Kenneth W. Miller, $1,054.31; In Receivables Inc. v. were all ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments.
In a case in Saline Circuit, 63cv-22-1469 CKS Prime Investments LLC v. Deontay Ivy, Seller Plaintiff (Debt Coll.), 22nd Circuit Division 2, Saline Circuit was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments. In a case in Bowie County, Kerria Hemphill, unlawful detainer; CKS Prime Investments vs. John Foster Jr., default was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments.
In yet another case in Saline Circuit, 63cv-22-968 CKS Prime Investments LLC v. Brandi P Sibert, 22nd Circuit Division 3, Saline Circuit was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments. In the small estate case in Saline Circuit, 63pr-22-487 Deandria Kendrix v. CKS Prime Investments LLC, 22nd Circuit Division 2, Saline Circuit was ruled in favor of CKS Prime Investments.
These are just a few of the many court cases involving CKS Prime Investments LLC in recent months. While these cases may not necessarily be indicative of the company's overall performance, they do provide an insight into how the company operates in certain situations. It is important to note that the judgments in these cases are not necessarily indicative of the outcome of future cases involving CKS Prime Investments.
